The Digiwhist dataset contains information about tenders, procurers, suppliers etc. that we previously didn’t have.
The old Digiwhist schema, although slightly outdated, gives a pretty good picture of what info we will have available.
This dataset gives a clearer picture of each tender, its lots, the bids in each lot and the bidders in each bid. How these are related can be seen in the new database design.
Do we want to include any extra info in the interface?
Proposals I have so far:
- include address_of_implementation in tender details i.e. the physical location where the tender services/goods are deployed
- currently the Tender Details section on contract details page (e.g. this one) contains a section with “Other contractors in this tender”. I think it would be better to replace that with “other contracts in this tender” that would contains contracts from the other lots, if any. That way people still have access to the “other contractors in this tenders” without pulling them out of the context of their contracts
- add to contract details the bidders that didn’t won
If you have more ideas, bring them on!